18 thoughts on “Mission Statement

  1. What do you mean “good guess” I pretty much hit the nail right on the head “reformed Pope”. There are alot of you who are bitter at the church but only YOU could/would do this(with a little help from your friends) I had my thoughts but when I read the whole web site I knew it was you. Touche’ John Paul Touche’

  2. Before I delete your comment, (we don’t attack people individually on this site) allow me to say,
    “I think you sound defensive.” But that’s okay, it’s tough defending a church like City Business. You know you’re wrong, but you can’t admit it. I will pray that God touches your heart, and allows you to see through the enemies deceptive lies.

  3. Before you delete my post? why would you do that?
    I dont get it, who have I “attacked”?
    I really do think this is funny, but thats all it is FUNNY. I can take what people say out of context and make anyone sound like a idiot, but lets be serious guys. If you want to post up a blog you should be talking about Bitterness.

  4. I don’t mind arguing the issues, but lets not attack people by name. (And yes, I realize that I’m being hypocritical, seeing as how the slogan of our blog calls someone out, but its our blog… so…)

    And thankyou for thinking its funny. That’s really our ultimate goal. Well, at least its my ultimate goal.

    And thanks for the comment FedUp95, I think I still have my rock somewhere too. We’ll have to have a “Why were we Fed Up?” reunion in 2005. The 10 year anniversary.

  5. Pingback: City Business Church » Blog Archive » Taking one for the team

  6. (catalyst said the following on December 12th, 2004 at 12:24 am:

    “Before I delete your comment, (WE DON’T ATTACK PEOPLE INDIVIDUALLY ON THIS SITE) allow me to say…I don’t mind arguing the issues, BUT LETS NOT ATTACK PEOPLE BY NAME.”)
    —————————————————————————

    Dunno bout that one, cat.

    I know this is your blog and all, and I don’t want to get booted from your site in my attempt to speak the truth, in love I hope, but it seems to me like your statement here is at best inconsistent/forgetful, and at worst untruthful.

    It is evident to me that you guys DO endorse/approve personal attacks, at least in effect, by allowing many of these personal attacks to take place. I believe there is a way to point out sin, error, and so forth, objectively and non-emotionally, and without resorting to anger, bitterness, etc., which many around here are permitted to do on a consistent basis (let me know if you would like me to provide proof of this).

    Just so long, that is, as the attacks are directed AT the right people — those whom you DISAGREE with.

    And are being launched BY the right people — those whom you AGREE with.

    I even recall a few personal attacks directed at “Yours Truly” under the post Ousted Pastor Returns to Grays Harbor, which, though you read, you guys still allowed to be launched, and then let slide, without a word. In fact, if memory serves, I do believe the tenor of those were even, if I may use the word, “lauded” by RP :)

    Maybe it’s simply like what Dirty Harry said in Magnum Force: he didn’t mind the killing, as long as the “right people” were getting killed. ;)

    ymmv

    joebib

  7. For the better too! (good job trolling joe baby, although digging up a 3 year old post makes you seem a little desperate)

    Speaking of: I found my rock when I moved. Guess I missed the reunion though.

  8. [Comment ID #27472 Will Be Quoted Here]

    Cat, I appreciate your candor.

    WTFJD —

    Not trolling……this time ;)

    Nor desperate, just curious.

    joebaby

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


seven × = 42

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>