www.clarkwatch.com
Posted on March 30th, 2005 by Reformed Pope into the Uncategorized categoryHere is the post emailed to me from our friend Anonymous.
I started a new semester this week at Clark College in Vancouver WA. I work full time, go to school, and still somehow manage to have a life. I like school, I really do or else I wouldn’t be doing it, but I really dislike Clark.
I’ve been to several schools now, and I think I’mstarting to understand what makes one school bad, and another good.
Here’s what I’ve found at Clark: The teachers are better than those at Portland CC. Sometimes I think I’ve learned more from one class at Clark than a full semester at PCC.
The campus is nice. It’s large enough to have all the things you need in a college, good labs, student center where you can get a latte etc. but not so large that you can’t get around. And hey, free parking!
The problem with Clark is with its administration. The bureaucracy alone is bad enough to make a government worker cringe. I could bore you for hours with tales of getting the run-around, insane paper work, and illogical, inflexible rules.
One example: last year school was canceled the first week due to snow. Because I needed the instructor to add me to the class, I turned in the normal “late registration” form with my instructor’s signature.
However, my paperwork was submitted two weeks past the first day of classes. I also had to fill out a form with a statement as to why I was registering two weeks late (”because you guys canceled the first week of classes!”).
These forms all had to be submitted to the Dean, along with a form for him to sign. Later, the forms then had to be picked up from the Dean’s office and re-submitted to the registration office. The lady that got the paperwork called and told me “You submitted it the wrong office, it’s supposed to go to “X” office.” So, I went back, picked up the paper work, took it to another counter, where the EXACT SAME LADY received the forms. The look in her eyes dared me to protest.
I finally received confirmation of enrollment the day before my final!
Believe me when I say I have never had a semester without some sort of bureaucratic problem.
At first I thought I was really unlucky. Or maybe I was just incompetent, always trying to do the wrong thing at the wrong time.
However, as I started to connect with other students I found that the majority of people I talked to secretly felt the same way I did. Even the instructors sometimes mention what a hard time they have navigating the myriad of rules and regulations that is Clark College.
Why does this matter to me? Sure it’s frustrating dealing with stuff like this, but it’s a part of life right? Of course. However, my point is that Clark’s administrative office, in effect, actively discourages people from pursuing a higher education. Rather than being a source of encouragement and going out of their way to help you achieve your goals and become a better person, the stringent rules and silly legalistic edicts make it harder to get through school. In fact, had I spent my Freshman year there, I think I would have been too discouraged to continue on with my education.
And for those that want to bash me about speaking out: you may say “you’re giving the school a bad name” or “you need to take these issues up with the administrators”. The fact is, the current administration either doesn’t
A) think that there is anything wrong with their policies or
B) have any motivation to change.
I could stand at a counter and rail on the administrator, or beg and plead for a 15 minute meeting with the Dean, but we all know how far that would get me.
Rather, change has to come from outside pressure, and how will that happen without our speaking out?
I challenge you to find a place in history where sitting back and accepting the status quo affected a positive change.
Thank God for the ability to have open Frank discussions. Without it we’d probably still be in the crusades.
Finally, perhaps the biggest question is this: Why is it OK to talk about a school like this, but never a church? If you were to read this again and substitute CBC every time I wrote Clark, would you accuse me of being bitter, or bringing shame to God? Do you believe me if I say I like the individuals at school, but not the system they work under? Is it not the same if I say the same about CBC, or am I again bitter? Personally, I find this separation illogical and the advocates of this position either naive, or promoting a hidden agenda. Anyway, that’s my two cents. I guess now I’ll sit back and wait for someone to accuse me of heresy for comparing the “house of God” to a secular college.
" rel="nofollow">
RSS feed for posts


