“Local” church vs. “Para-” church
Posted on August 3rd, 2007 by David Mackin into the Uncategorized, David Mackin Writes: categoryOne day Brendan (name changed), academic dean of the Bible College I was on the teaching staff of) invited the faculty into his office for a meeting. The question that Brendan asked us was: Should we allow Youth with a Mission (YWAM) to lead a chapel time for the students at our college? (YWAM is an international youth-oriented missions organization that evangelizes around the world and works with local churches in the areas in which they minister.) This would mean that YWAM participants might lead worship in chapel, would share what God is doing through their mission outreaches, provide more information to PBC students who might be interested in going on a YWAM missions trip, and maybe take up an offering.
The discussion from all of the faculty members, some of which were elders of the local church that sponsors the Bible college, was very against the idea. Norm (name changed), one of the department heads in the church, for instance, said that the parents that send their young people to our school expect that they will be taught about “the local church,” and because YWAM was not a local church, it would not be promoting the local church values of their parents to allow YWAM to take up some of our chapel time.
I disagreed with Norm and the others and, among other comments, said that if they were concerned about YWAM taking up an offering from the students, we could always give them the chapel time but just ask them not to try to raise any financial support. Why not? I had only heard of the much good that YWAM had done globally, and it would be a good opportunity for the students to expand their horizons and get the opportunity to go out to the mission field when they might not get the same open doors through our college. I was unable to convince anyone to allow YWAM to host the chapel.
At the end of the meeting, I discovered that the decision not to have YWAM host one of our Bible college's chapel sessions had already been made by the elders of the church before the faculty meeting even began! For some reason, which is a whole issue in itself, Brendan allowed the faculty to weigh-in on the question even though their input had absolutely no influence on the previously-made decision!
When I learned this, I felt used. I felt that I had just been set up by the church eldership to see if I would conform to their already-decided policy. To my regret, I let my flesh take charge for a moment and sarcastically told Brendan as I was leaving his office, "Hey, any time you want my input or advice as a faculty member of this college, you just let me know. My office is just right down the hall…"
These questions come to mind about this story:
(1) Why would the local church leadership want to discuss a question in a college faculty meeting for which the final decision had already been made? Wouldn't that just be a waste of company time?
(2) Do you think that the reason Norm gave for not allowing YWAM to share in a college chapel, i.e., the parent/sponsors' “local church” philosophy, was the only or main reason the final decision was made?
(3) Has the new pastor of this sponsoring church allowed YWAM, or any other para-church missions organizations, to host a chapel since he's taken over at the helm? Would he?
(4) Do some local churches harbor a secret prejudice toward para-church organizations? If so, why?
" rel="nofollow">
RSS feed for posts


