This website is a parody of City Bible Church. We are not owned or operated by Frank Damazio or affiliated with City Bible Church. Please do not send us your tithe.
It is not by grace that one enters the kingdom of heaven, but by tithing.

- Damazio 3:16


Has City Bible Church withdrawn from MFI?

Posted on April 2nd, 2008 by catalyst into the Comments From Others category

We recently received this email from a reader:

Do either of you know anything about Frank withdrawing his membership from MFI? Would that mean he'd be withdrawing his church as well? (If so, no doubt it has something to do with Bob MacGregor being Mr. Iverson's choice for the next MFI top dog.)

If Frank is withdrawing completely, I wonder if he's starting something of his own to replace it?

Can any of you verify this statement? Or is it just a rumor? If true, I think it's probably one of the few decisions by Frank that I actually commend. MFI is a pretty useless organization.

31 Comments To This Post

  1. FICM said:    

    I can’t imagine a scenario where this would be true. The MFI offices are above the CBC offices on the campus there. With PF as one of the “Apostlic Leadership Team”, he would have to effectively thumb his nose at all the other ALT members and kick MFI out of the building. PF is where he is today because of his relationships with these men, and the CBC eldership is completely bought-in to MFI as well. I don’t think he could mastermind the kind of church mutiny against the organization that keeps CBC at the head of the MaFIa.

    Once you’re in the family, you’re never out.

  2. FICM said:    

    On the other hand, I wonder if these rumors have started because Iverson chose MacGregor as his successor to head MaFIa. I still think that at best it’s a rumor.

  3. David Mackin said:    

    So far, it sounds like a rumor to me, too. MFI is a fellowship for senior pastors and not for churches. The idea of withdrawing personally and yet keeping one’s church in the organization does not fit the MFI’s purpose. Anyone interested in this can go to the MFI website and get continual updates as to who is on the leadership team an who is still a member: http://www.mfi-online.org/

  4. My Little Pony said:    

    I agree with FICM. While Frank is undoubtedly pissed off that he isn’t Iverson’s successor, I cannot envision CBC withdrawing from MFI. CBC is the MFI mother ship, after all.

    On another topic: I noticed today that CBC is the only church in Oregon with registered lobbyists, i.e., the church has TWO lobbyists on retainer to represent its interests in Salem.

    It IS legal, contrary to popular belief, for non-profits to lobby, as long as it doesn’t comprise a large percentage of an organization’s overall resources and work. So, my concern isn’t the legality. My concern is that the lobbyist indicates the existence of the fact that CBC has a political agenda and political interests. This seems contrary to the life Jesus lived on this earth while incarnate, and contrary to Scripture generally. For years, I have felt that CBC’s involvement in politics has been inappropriate, i.e., endorsing ultra-conservative Republicans and essentially sending the message directly and indirectly that all “real” Christians are/must be conservative politically, and these things have concerned me greatly, as I know they’ve concerned many of you. Which is why I thought you might find this factoid interesting.

  5. TheOtherFormerPBCPrez said:    

    FICM said:

    …his successor to head MaFIa

    Good one! Love it. Wish I’d thought of it!

    Joebib warned me that this is a site rife with conspiracies. Perhaps one of the leaders of this blog has infiltrated MFI? From the MFI website:

    “there was a desire to be a catalyst to bring pastors and church leaders together for the purpose of fellowship, relationship and strength”

  6. Not-Anonymous said:    

    So, I went to check out the MFI site that Mackin linked to and started looking around in the photo gallery. I found this picture particular interesting and not because of the picture but because of the name of the file:

    Bob and Frank Talk Money

  7. FICM said:    

    Not-Anonymous on April 2, 2008 at 8:59 am said:

    So, I went to check out the MFI site that Mackin linked to and started looking around in the photo gallery. I found this picture particular interesting and not because of the picture but because of the name of the file:

    Bob and Frank Talk Money

    That’s hilarious. I think we need to have a photo caption contest with that one.

    My entry: “Yeesh! That’s not nearly enough. I’m getting back on-stage and asking for more.”

  8. catalyst said:    

    I think you all underestimate Frank’s egotism. If he isn’t going to take over MFI, then why does he care about being a member? What does he get out of it? And if it’s loyalty to the family, I suspect that loyalty is beginning to wane. I don’t doubt that this is just a rumor, but I bet it’s a rumor started by Frank to gauge the response of the MaFIa family.

  9. Samaritan said:    

    “Look, this one has room for a few more zeros, Frank.”

  10. Recovering Charasmatic said:    

    CBC is still a member, but Frank has completely checked out. There is a quiet “network” of CBC related churches and pastors forming behind the scenes separate from MFI.

  11. David Mackin said:    

    Recovering Charasmatic said: There is a quiet “network” of CBC related churches and pastors forming behind the scenes separate from MFI.

    RC, this sounds very interesting but can you give us more specifics? if this is true, it is huge news because said leaders were always big on how “unified” they were and “divisions” were anathema; (if i remember correctly, you said that you used to be quite high in the spiritual food chain around there…)

    but before i get carried away, several questions that instantly pop into my brain re: your statement are:

    (1) is this network centered around the Prosperity Doctrine or the pastor named above - or both?

    (2) what would the reasons be to form a separate organization (besides ego and maybe prosperity doctrines or conserving income stream)? as i’ve posted before, said pastor told me personally many years ago that he was the guy who began the MFI and did most of the work behind scenes with the monthly “seed bag,” etc, so the mantle transference to another could have been quite a hit for him; starting another organization himself, however, shows that he does not feel that he is “too busy” or “not pastoral enough” to handle such a group!

    (3) is this network already beginning to pay dues to CBC?

    (4) can you provide us any literature from the new group?

  12. Fortunes To Be Made said:    

    We heard a rumor that Starbucks was offering him a position.
    Lattes are very lucrative!

  13. Free At Last said:    

    What about the obvious- is Wendell Smith mad and how about his clone
    Ken Wilde–rumor was it they were pulling out months ago.

    What is this style of leadership they use–oh yea–always keep em
    guessing!

  14. Reformed Pope said:    

    I noticed today that CBC is the only church in Oregon with registered lobbyists, i.e., the church has TWO lobbyists on retainer to represent its interests in Salem.

    TWO lobbyists? On retainer? That sounds awesome…

    I think we should start a list of the top ten reasons (rumors) why we refer to CBC as City Business Church.

    Reason #10: They are the only church in Oregon with registered lobbyists to protect their interests. Two Lobbyists…One retainer…Zero Christ.

  15. Recovering Charasmatic said:    

    Don’t know that there are any “dues” involved in CBC network. Just bringing churches that have started out from CBC “into the fold” so to speak. Kind of a power circle club, so to speak. Not exactly what MFI is, more a way from Frank to spread his influence more directly. I don’t think it is about the prosperity doctrine because they don’t actually indentify themselves with that directly, it’s just what they do. As far as ego, why does any Sr. Pastor do anything outside of their own walls? Becuase you always get to be a bigger deal when you aren’t at home. Of course it’s about ego. Late 50s, maybe another 5-10 years left as the main guy, you’ve gotta start thinking of ways to keep from falling off the radar the day you hand off the church. That’s all folks.

  16. Samaritan said:    

    Reason #9: How Frank and the leadership spend tithes and offerings, is NOBODIES business.

  17. ex-City Bible Slave said:    

    I think we should start a list of the top ten reasons (rumors) why we refer to CBC as City Business Church.

    Reason #10: They are the only church in Oregon with registered lobbyists to protect their interests. Two Lobbyists…One retainer…Zero Christ.

    Reason #9: Asking how Frank and the leadership spend tithes and offerings, is NOBODIES business.

    Reason #8: Church policy on the poor: “If you’re poor, broke, jobless, and/or homeless….we come to you (helps make us look better), but don’t even think about coming to us. We wouldn’t want to upset any of our members.”

    Reason #7: Church policy on money: “Money is the root of all evil - that’s why we insist that you give all of yours to us. We will make it holy for you.”

  18. Free At Last said:    

    Sorry but still confused=although nothing new in the circus!

    Did Frank leave MFI personally and was it announced? If I read correctly
    he personally left but not CBC and where does Bob Mac G. figure into all of
    this? Is he taking over the church in the future.
    Thanks for clarifying.
    Now for the next slight of hand trick.

  19. ex-pbc-er said:    

    Just found out cbc is putting in a starbucks in the church lobby. They are moving the reception area and book store. It will be located there. FYI

  20. Fortunes To Be Made said:    

    Hate to be an I told you so!!–
    Please refer to my earlier comment that Starbucks was offering him a position–

    Lattes are Lucrative! Now on campus even.

  21. FICM said:    

    Fortunes To Be Made on April 16, 2008 at 8:55 pm said:

    Hate to be an I told you so!!–
    Please refer to my earlier comment that Starbucks was offering him a position–

    Lattes are Lucrative! Now on campus even.

    This talk about Starbucks is mildly funny but can’t be serious. They’d lose their tax exempt status and have to raise taxes - er, I mean, tithes to 15% to compensate for the loss in revenue.

  22. Anonymous said:    

    Back to the original question, on the City Bible web page there is still a link to MFI. Plus, on the MFI website you can find Frank listed among the Apostolic Leadership team here: MFI-ALT
    So I think it’s safe to say this is an unsubstantiated rumor.

  23. Recovering Charasmatic said:    

    Anony

    Anonymous on April 17, 2008 at 6:36 am said:

    Back to the original question, on the City Bible web page there is still a link to MFI. Plus, on the MFI website you can find Frank listed among the Apostolic Leadership team here: MFI-ALT
    So I think it’s safe to say this is an unsubstantiated rumor.

    Anonymous, you might want to wait a bit and hit refresh on the MFI page. They won’t be excited about broadcasting the news, but it has to come out sometime.

  24. David Mackin said:    

    To date, FD is still on the MFI site. I’m on their Black List, but I think that someone should contact MFI and ask them re this. Here’s the contact information:
    E:info@mfi-online.org + P: 503-252-4634 + L: 9200 NE Fremont • Portland, OR 97220

  25. Samaritan said:    

    Dear MFI,

    Before I give my Tithe to Frank Damazio, could you tell me please whether FD is a member in good standing with MFI? If not, could you direct me to another MFI affiliated minister who could be trusted with my tithe?

    Thank you!

    Ira B. Tither

  26. catalyst said:    

    Samaritan on April 18, 2008 at 5:43 am said:

    Dear MFI,

    Before I give my Tithe to Frank Damazio, could you tell me please whether FD is a member in good standing with MFI? If not, could you direct me to another MFI affiliated minister who could be trusted with my tithe?

    Thank you!

    Ira B. Tither

    Heh. Nice!

  27. ex-pbc-er said:    

    FICM on April 17, 2008 at 5:50 am said:

    Fortunes To Be Made on April 16, 2008 at 8:55 pm said:

    Hate to be an I told you so!!–
    Please refer to my earlier comment that Starbucks was offering him a position–

    Lattes are Lucrative! Now on campus even.

    This talk about Starbucks is mildly funny but can’t be serious. They’d lose their tax exempt status and have to raise taxes - er, I mean, tithes to 15% to compensate for the loss in revenue.

    It is true. They want to have it done before the conference. It will be like a Starbuck’s in Safeway or Freddy’s. CBC will hire and fire and run the cafe’, the employees will receive Starbuck’s training but be employee’s of CBC.

  28. DC said:    


    I found this site today, and in reading through the blogs and comments of contributors, it struck me how ’small’ the topics being discussed are relative to what we’re called to within the kingdom — such a spirit of judgment, gossip, taking pleasure in others shortfalls, etc. — no wonder creation still waits earnestly for the sons of God to be revealed — my sense is that we cannot be revealed so long as we invest our energies on such small matters that clearly are a manifestation of the flesh and not of the Spirit. This reads about as spiritlessly and secularly as some Hollywood tabloid. In my view (which I can only hope would be God’s as well, as I am no man’s judge) if a side-by-side of 1 Corinthians 13 and this site were done, the differences in spirit and potential for profitability to the kingdom would be stark indeed.

  29. catalyst said:    

    I’m not gonna defend everything on this blog. We definitely cross the line at times. I think on balance, it’s a good thing, but I understand those who disagree.

    That said, check out this YouTube video from John Piper:

    In this short clip, he most accurately captures the motivation behind this blog.

    Is this blog perfect: No. But what City Bible is doing is worse, and so we go on….

  30. ex-City Bible Slave said:    

    This reads about as spiritlessly and secularly as some Hollywood tabloid. In my view (which I can only hope would be God’s as well, as I am no man’s judge) if a side-by-side of 1 Corinthians 13 and this site were done, the differences in spirit and potential for profitability to the kingdom would be stark indeed.

    DC, sometimes in life there are things that people don’t agree with or understand, and there is two ways to approach them. Fight back or run. This blog has become our method of fighting back. Now I agree that there are many ridiculous statements made on this blog and sarcasm / cynicism is ramped. But remember just because you don’t agree with it doesn’t mean it doesn’t serve a purpose. God always takes senseless things and makes them useful. Just because you can’t wrap your mind around it doesn’t mean others do not. So instead of judging in a manner that makes you sound hypocritical (you obviously vehemently oppose calling people out on their wrongs, yet you do the same thing), you should reflect and ask yourself why? Why are there so many people angry at the church? Why are there so many hurt believers in our society? Why are there so many people dissatisfied with what is going on in Christian culture today? Why does this blog exist? And in thinking long and hard about your answers I hope you will discover (as many of us have) that it may just be because there are people like you on the other side. And as long as you keep doing what you’re doing, we will keep doing what we are doing.

    And in case you were wondering, to me this blog is not supposed to read as a spiritual tool for people to find the answers to the mysteries of the Bible. This blog is being used as a tool to question authority and call out backward theology that takes the emphasis off of Jesus and puts it on power, position, wealth, and class (hence the title “City Business Church.” And I know no matter what I say you will disagree as you are probably entrapped in a mindset that prohibits you from clearly thinking about the woes of the current state of Christianity. Trust me, 10 years ago I would have hated this blog as vehemently as anyone else. But God rescued me from the church and now I see the wrongness of my former ways. I pray that God will reveal the same truths to you and you will find peace in His Grace and grace alone.

  31. TheOtherFormerPBCPrez said:    

    Hello DC,

    I’m making an assumption that you have not attended either CBC or PBC. I’m curious if you have any first hand experience with the church?

    Twice in your post you used the word ’small’, qualifying “topics” and “matters”. Not to get us into a semantical squabble, but perhaps that is a another way of stating that the range of topics is narrow. I would agree that there seems to be a few major themes that find discussion here (e.g. money & power, which I suppose are connected more than separated). Makes me think of Richard Foster’s book Money, Sex and Power. But I digress.

    What I will say though is that more than a decade of attendance and participation in CBC/PBC had an enormous impact on my life. Not all of them were negative, but in several areas I made significant life decisions based on strongly worded advice, which felt more like a mandate. Now, after a decade of being out of CBC I can look in the rearview mirror and see that things were done and said that are contrary to a healthy, well balanced church.

Leave A New Comment

Enter the validation code from the image