Havis writes: "…tithing is a part of my covenant relationship with God. Covenants are made and confirmed with tokens. Jesus brings his blood to the covenant and I (being of the seed of Abraham) bring the 10th part of my blessing to Jesus as Abraham brought his 10th part to Melchizedek. I say it, over and over, again and again, I do not tithe because someone has constrained me and told me that I must tithe. I tithe because I want to. I love tithing. I have faithfully and lovingly tithed for more than 45 years. It is one of the most pleasurable things I do in life me." (June 8, 2007)
To say that tithing is a part of your covenant relationship with God since you are a son of Abraham by faith in Jesus Christ is, at first glance, an admirable admission. After all, should not all believers follow in the footsteps of Abraham, the father of the faith? It is also admirable when you say that you have "faithfully and lovingly tithed for more than 45 years. It is one of the most pleasurable things I do in life me."
Havis: I would like to submit to you a few thoughts:
(1) You say that in your covenant relationship with God, “Jesus brings his blood” and “I bring the tithe.” This gives the impression that your covenant relationship with God is not based solely on grace through faith in the blood of Christ, but on a mixture of Christ’s blood and your tithe. I know you say that you tithe voluntarily, which implies that it is not a covenant condition, but it still sounds dangerous to me.
(2) You say that you tithe since you are a part of “the seed of Abraham.” It is true that Paul calls all believers the sons and daughters of Abraham by their faith in Jesus Christ. However, not one NT writer ever connects being the seed of Abraham with tithing. As RP has asked you: do you also consider circumcision as part of your covenant relationship with God since it was the sign of God’s covenant with him?
(3) When you tell us that you have "faithfully and lovingly tithed for more than 45 years. It is one of the most pleasurable things I do in life me,” I think it’s good that you’re sharing, but I feel you need to consider not becoming like the Pharisee who went to the temple and was so proud of his tithing record (Luke 18:12). Jesus says that our giving should be in secret (Matthew 6:1-4).
(4) In another post, you raise the question of the everlasting covenant and its relationship to the Abrahamic and New Covenants. In my view, all previous covenants, along with all of their “tokens,” have been fulfilled and abolished in Jesus Christ and the New Covenant in his blood. I think that the Book of Hebrews makes this very clear. To imply that tithing was a part of the everlasting covenant before Genesis 14:20 has no scriptural support.
(5) I agree with you that Jesus is the new high priest of the New Covenant in the order of Melchizedek. The New Covenant was sealed by his own death on the cross as our Passover sacrifice and demonstrated by his resurrection from the dead as our Firstfruits offering. In his death and resurrection, therefore, Jesus himself fulfills and abolishes every sacrifice and offering of the OT system including the tithe, which, among other things, was a part of the heave offering system given to the priests.
Hebrews 7 shows that Christ's priesthood is superior to all previous priesthoods. Yes, Christ is in the order of Melchizedek but the author of this chapter never identifies him as Jesus in the flesh or as an OT Christophany. Instead, the author uses terms of similitude: "like" or "as" Melchizedek.
There have been so many Christians fascinated with the identification of Melchizedek down through the centuries that a Melchizedek cult was formed. Because such speculation, condemned in kind by Paul in the Pastorals, had ran amuck, the Church, in an official way, stopped such guessing about this king-priest of Salem. Such speculation is not essential to the Gospel and can divert Christians from keeping their focus on its proclamation to the world.
Hebrews 7 uses tithing to show the inferiority of Aaron, Levi as well as Abraham to Melchizedek as a prototype of Jesus Christ and the New Covenant in his blood. Thus, to agree with what Paul said: "In all things that Christ should have the pre-eminence."
Even though
Hebrews 7 describes the priesthood of Christ as according to the order of Melchizedek, I have been unable to find any NT writer who applies Melchizedek, or his order, to any Christian pastor/leader or believer. I recently mentioned this point to a major pro-tither. He side-stepped the issue and said that all believers were a part of the Melchizedek priesthood. That sounds good since all believers are called "kings and priests" by the NT (as Melchizedek was a king-priest), but such a broadening of the Melchizedek priesthood, among other problems, creates the question: Why can't every believer get a part of the Church's tithe booty!?
Because of this, I think that we are on safer ground to say that the order of Melchizedek only applies to Jesus Christ and his unique birth ("without father or mother"), death and resurrection ("lives in the power of an indestructible life").
From these biblical facts I conclude, at least so far, that pastor/leaders have no NT basis to claim to be a part of the Melchizedek priesthood, and, therefore, they have no NT right to lay claim to the tithes of God's people in trying to use Abraham's tithe to Melchizedek as their precedent.
Abraham's one-time tithe of war booty to the king-priest of Salem cannot be set up as a regular giving pattern for NT Christians because (as many on this blog have faithfully pointed out):
(1) It was a one-time tithe;
(2) Abraham used other people's money and goods to pay the tithe;
(3) It was a voluntary tithe and not a compulsory one; and
(4) The truth that all of the NT writers wanted believers to recall from Abraham's life was his faith/trust in God since none mention his tithe to Melchizedek except in
Hebrews 7 and that was never to command Christians to tithe but simply to say that Jesus and his New Covenant is superior to all OT personages and institutions.
I am glad, Havis, that God has blessed your tithing over the years. I do not want to take such rejoicing away from you. Nevertheless, since none of the arguments from Melchizedek or his priesthood prove that Christians are obligated to tithe, I must encourage you to continue to tithe voluntarily and privately. As Paul said to the Christians in Rome about contentious issues that were not essential to the Gospel:
"Let them keep it between themselves and God" (
Romans 14:22).